iBrowser V 1.3 released!

mmjaeger · 2005-08-05 08:59:09

release of iBrowser V 1.3 build 08052005
- updated phpThumb to V 1.6 - please see phpThumb changelog for details
- simplified the WYSIWYG editor interface files
- added interface file for the HTMLarea editor
- added random image - parameters: $cfg['random'];
please see phpThumb readme for detailed settings
- added image caption function

preview can be found here.

iBrowser can be downloaded here.

craq · 2005-08-14 01:09:54

can you please change iBrowser and iManager to both center to the screen instead of position at the top left of the screen? That is the only thing I am not happy with about this plugin. Otherwise, your plugin is the most amazing plugin for image handling.

craq · 2005-08-14 02:03:51

I also noticed that your plugin does not work with the Context Menus.

I also tried your iManager and iBrowser plugin with Tiny MCE. Both did not return the image back to the editor (tiny mce).

mmjaeger · 2005-08-14 02:16:55

craq wrote:

I also noticed that your plugin does not work with the Context Menus.
I also tried your iManager and iBrowser plugin with Tiny MCE. Both did not return the image back to the editor (tiny mce).

Hello,

Since iManager and iBrowser run in all most common editors, I haven't figured out how to integrate those in the context menu in case the editor provide this feature at all - e.g. SPAW doesn't.

As to returning the image back to the editor, I haven't had any problems yet.

chakal · 2005-08-15 09:13:24

Hi,

iManager is written and distributed under the Lesser General Public License LGPL which means that its source code is freely-distributed and available to the general public for non-commercial use.

LGPL = non-commercial use ????

What that it mean ?

chaK!

mmjaeger · 2005-08-15 09:16:40

if you use it in a commercial environment and/or are thinking of making money with it you need a special license.

chakal · 2005-08-15 10:04:16

If iManager is a LGPL sofware, it CAN'T be restrict to non-commercial use.
You need to choose another license if you want restrict to non-commercial use.

chak!

mmjaeger · 2005-08-15 10:09:22

chakal wrote:

If iManager is a LGPL sofware, it CAN'T be restrict to non-commercial use.
You need to choose another license if you want restrict to non-commercial use.
chak!

what license would you advise me to choos then - this really seems to be a confusing issue since everybody is telling something else - I'm kind of lost.

chakal · 2005-08-15 10:34:23

Sorry, but I am FSF fan so I only use GPL/LGPL.

But I'm sure you can't restrict LGPL in any way:

LGPL wrote:

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

If you restrict to non-commercial use, you change the licence document

The only real difference between GPL and LGPL is the LGPL can be deeply linked with proprietary programs.

So, if you want to restrict to non-commercial use, I don't know, but you could make money with GPL/LGPL with services around your product.

chaK!

craq · 2005-08-15 13:41:47

I'm using it on a commercial web site but I am not charging any $ for it. I'm simply using it because of the great features it has. I don't know why you would bother to restrict it from commercial sites? I could see atleast not letting people charge for the plugin since it is your work and the plugin is simply amazing.

mmjaeger · 2005-08-15 14:36:01

craq wrote:

I'm using it on a commercial web site but I am not charging any $ for it. I'm simply using it because of the great features it has. I don't know why you would bother to restrict it from commercial sites? I could see atleast not letting people charge for the plugin since it is your work and the plugin is simply amazing.

I think we should continue this conversation either by pm or email.

craq · 2005-08-15 14:38:52

you have my email
and I just emailed you regarding other things.

gogo · 2005-08-16 00:54:27

mmjaeger:

Essentially the LGPL is the same as the GPL, except that it's not quite as "viral", you can link LGPL libraries with your closed source code and it doesn't require that you open source your code (GPL does). Neither GPL nor LGPL restrict the licencee to non-commercial use at all. They do restrict you from charging for the source (you can charge distribution costs though), but not from using it commercially. The LGPL is "friendlier" to closed source code than the GPL, which is decidedly unfriendly to closed source code.

I don't know what licence would be best for you, go see your lawyer.

mmjaeger · 2005-08-16 01:17:11

gogo wrote:

mmjaeger:
Essentially the LGPL is the same as the GPL, except that it's not quite as "viral", you can link LGPL libraries with your closed source code and it doesn't require that you open source your code (GPL does). Neither GPL nor LGPL restrict the licencee to non-commercial use at all. They do restrict you from charging for the source (you can charge distribution costs though), but not from using it commercially. The LGPL is "friendlier" to closed source code than the GPL, which is decidedly unfriendly to closed source code.
I don't know what licence would be best for you, go see your lawyer.

don't have to see my lawyer - just have to find another license

kimss · 2005-08-16 05:42:54

Hmm, if you want to release your source for everyone to look at - and restrict it for commercial use you could look at this one :
http://creativecommons.org/license/

Otherwise you could look at IonCube encoder, which gives you a powerful tool. Encrypt your software and add a "powered by my logo", by purchasing the lisence this is removed. A non commercial user should not be alarmed by such a link, and a non commercial user also might want to purchase to remove it. You also have Zend Encoder, it has finally startet seeing normal pricing in my opinion,

Mvh,
Kim Steinhaug
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Easy CMS - Et brukervennlig publiseringssystem - Easy Webshop - Nettbutikk med krefter

Last edited by kimss (2006-02-27 19:23:00)

MySchizoBuddy · 2005-08-17 05:11:55

Where is the tutorial on how to add iManager and IBrowser to Xinha.

mmjaeger · 2005-08-17 05:23:37

MySchizoBuddy wrote:

Where is the tutorial on how to add iManager and IBrowser to Xinha.

why don't you read the readme file - it tells you how to add it

MySchizoBuddy · 2005-08-17 08:07:01

ok got it working, does any one know why it doesn't look into subdirectories.

Xinha Discussion Forum

Announcement

#1 2005-08-05 08:59:09

iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#2 2005-08-14 01:09:54

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#3 2005-08-14 02:03:51

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#4 2005-08-14 02:16:55

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#5 2005-08-15 09:13:24

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#6 2005-08-15 09:16:40

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#7 2005-08-15 10:04:16

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#8 2005-08-15 10:09:22

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#9 2005-08-15 10:34:23

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#10 2005-08-15 13:41:47

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#11 2005-08-15 14:36:01

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#12 2005-08-15 14:38:52

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#13 2005-08-16 00:54:27

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#14 2005-08-16 01:17:11

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#15 2005-08-16 05:42:54

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#16 2005-08-17 05:11:55

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#17 2005-08-17 05:23:37

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

#18 2005-08-17 08:07:01

Re: iBrowser V 1.3 released!

Board footer