Memory Usage Problem Solution

gogo · 2005-07-19 02:43:30

I just want to draw current developer's (and anybody else who wants to help) attention to this... http://xinha.python-hosting.com/ticket/30

Thanks, we now return to your regularly scheduled programming (pun intended)

kimss · 2005-07-19 06:47:14

This update is a very important update, I av very happy to see this one Gogo.
I did some benchmarking with the memory before and after applying the latest and here are the results, a significant improvement!

Mvh,
Kim Steinhaug
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Easy CMS - Et brukervennlig publiseringssystem - Easy Webshop - Nettbutikk med krefter

Last edited by kimss (2006-02-27 19:21:57)

kimss · 2005-07-19 07:22:22

I might aswell compare the competition, and as we can see we have a long way to go but it shouldnt be impossible. Ive been using Drip for getting the numbers used for the comparisons here, just so that its mentioned.

gogo · 2005-07-19 07:37:21

For comparison Kim, are the FCK & Tiny using any plugins (or whatever they use), or more to the point, do they have all the features taht your 8-Plugin Xinha had ?

How does Xinha compare with no plugins to a no-plugin FCK or Tiny?

kimss · 2005-07-19 12:00:46

Both editors are loaded with mostly the same plugins from our CMS, I havnt benchmarked the different editors without plugins yet but I should do that for a more presice comparison and to be more fair. You could say that the above benchmark was a "production benchmark" from my standpoint,

Chris Allison · 2005-07-23 01:53:20

Good work. Thanks for addressing this issue.

kimss · 2005-09-19 08:06:23

As I updated my Xinha against the latest version I did another benchmark for Xinha without any plugins or content loaded for some comparison. After 14 consistend refreshes it seems to leak roughly 16,22 MB which should be in the green for normal usage in my opinion. I couldnt resist pulling of a test with all 40 plugins loaded, which had a little more memory leakage. However the editor became very sluggish with all loaded and took ages to initiate on my 1,2Ghz CPU - so I wouldn't recomment this to people unless you are _very sure_ your clients have updated computers with atleast 3Ghz processors,

I think the currect results look very good, great work with adressing the memory problems.

Edit :
The benchmark above is done with the Xinha version as of date 19 September 2005

Last edited by kimss (2005-09-19 12:20:45)

Xinha Discussion Forum

Announcement

#1 2005-07-19 02:43:30

Memory Usage Problem Solution

#2 2005-07-19 06:47:14

Re: Memory Usage Problem Solution

#3 2005-07-19 07:22:22

Re: Memory Usage Problem Solution

#4 2005-07-19 07:37:21

Re: Memory Usage Problem Solution

#5 2005-07-19 12:00:46

Re: Memory Usage Problem Solution

#6 2005-07-23 01:53:20

Re: Memory Usage Problem Solution

#7 2005-09-19 08:06:23

Re: Memory Usage Problem Solution

Board footer